Key Stage 3 Results make it a Hat Trick for Island Schools

Standards-Not-Tiers Press Release - 28th February 2008

Key Stage Three results released today by the DCSF show that the Isle of Wight delivered results above the England Average in all three subjects – English, Maths and Science - at this crucial stage in 2007. This is a significant improvement on the 2006 figures and is partly a result of the implementation of the new condensed Key Stage Three regime, in which many pupils took the tests a year early in Year 8 of middle school.

Standards-Not-Tiers research shows that good Key Stage Three results are usually a precursor to good GCSE results. Based on 2006 data the group is able to show that local authorities with similar Key Stage Three results, usually deliver GCSE results at the national average or better.

Whilst we acknowledge that we should aim to beat the average, currently the Isle of Wight is approximately 5% below the national average for five GCSE’s A*-C Including English and Maths and to bring our results up to the average will be a real achievement in such a short space of time. The fact is that raising standards is not an overnight operation but one that takes a number of years to achieve. What we are seeing now is positive proof that the improvements made so far are working. To denigrate them as Cllr Wells did earlier this week is wrong and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the process of improvement.

These excellent Key Stage Three results must be viewed together with the other data that has materialised over the last few days. Standards-Not-Tiers have today learned that for 5 GCSE’s A*-C including Math and English the Isle of Wight is in fact England’s 7th most improved local Authority (out of 149) over the last three years, not the 9th as previously reported. The fact that the county has no high schools delivering below the Government’s 30% target is also very significant.

We think that it is very regrettable that Cllr Wells has reacted so negatively to the encouraging results at GCSE. Earlier this week he stated that “we need to be realistic and recognise our results are not good enough”. Whilst it is true that our results can and should improve further, Standards-Not-Tiers believes that if the Council was truly being realistic it would acknowledge that it takes time for results to improve and that these signs of serious improvement should not be dismissed, simply because they fly in the face of its current arguments.

The improvements that are being produced here and now, are proof that if well managed and focused, our three tier structure is capable of raising standards to at least the national average and beyond. The Council on the other hand can provide no proof that their planned restructuring will lead to any improvement whatsoever. We demand that they provide the evidence before they put us through the pain of a wholesale reorganisation.

3 Responses to “Key Stage 3 Results make it a Hat Trick for Island Schools”

  1. 1
    Danny Says:

    The arguments in this statement from Standards Not Tiers are so sensible, reasoned and logical. The complete opposite in fact to those put forward by the council! It is amazing that the council have not clearly shown the proof they say they have for needing to make changes and can not provide any real evidence to show likely progress under their proposals. Yet still they refuse to listen and accept the evidence shown clearly here that says standards are moving in the right direction at a very encouraging pace.
    This is made all the more maddening if anyone else has read the ‘Joe Blogs’ post on how the council should not be criticised for having only achieved 2 stars on its recent rating because what we should really be looking at is the way it is moving - forwards and is making improvements! This is the absolute height of hypocrisy and they have recieved 2 stars for 2 years running so don’t appear to have made a huge leap forwards.

  2. 2
    Anon Says:

    Oops! I don’t think they read point 439 on ‘Have your say’ before issuing that!

    It appears though that a like-for-like comparison does show a sustained improvement, as did the GCSE (5 A*-C incE&M).

  3. 3
    Anonymous Says:

    .. and the front page of the County Press really mis-represented the data!!!

Leave a Reply

Please read our content disclaimer before posting any comments on this website.